Rescue America 2: Start Restoring the Language

It is Time to Take Action

We need to rescue America and bring conservative, constitutional, and patriotic leadership back to Congress in 2010 and regain the White House in 2012. Government of the people, by the people, and for the people must be restored.

One of America’s problems is that it has let the leftist radicals define what words mean and thus change the language to support radical causes and movements such as: abortion; socialism; communism; homosexual radicals advocating pedophilia; supporting illegal immigration; radical Islam & jihadists; big government; political correctness; and tyranny.

Where to Start

We should start in the radical political arena and political correctness first as these are basic to all radical leftists’ efforts. After that we should move on to the social and cultural areas. But please recognize they are not independent, it is one large problem affecting every aspect of our lives.

Socialism and Communism

Before the onslaught of America by the communist Soviet Union and their fellow travelers in America some words were universally seen as evil by patriotic Americans. America fought back on this front until the 1960’s and finally gave in entirely after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the communist Soviet Union at the beginning of the 1990’s. Our words and language have been corrupted and changed, respectively, for a reason. This reason is to weaken and destroy the United States. Therefore, it is time to fight back and restore our language by eliminating radical imposed new meanings to words and the resulting change to our common language of English.

Socialism is defined as a political and economic system, or form of government, where the state owns industry and capital. That is, there is no private ownership of industry or financial institutions such as banks in a socialist state. If the state, or government, owns all the means of production and all the means of financing production, distribution, and control of wealth, then a people’s right to self determination is entirely controlled by the government. Obviously this violates the Constitutional right to freedom of the people. Thus, socialism is always evil, wrong, and unconstitutional. Anyone advocating socialism is advocating the destruction of the Constitution, and thus, all of America. Socialism should therefore be seen as unconstitutional and advocating it or its practice as punishable offenses against the America people.

Communism takes socialism even further and demands abolishment of private property. Not just industry and capital, but private property. Thus, communism is a system of total control of its people and all aspects of their lives. Anything you can define as property; your home, land, money, food, etc. is owned by the government. Loss of freedom is nearly total. And, in both socialist and communists governments those striving for private ownership are enemies of the state and must be controlled. To maintain this control, eventually all freedoms are lost. The government becomes paramount and the individual is unimportant. Thus, communism is the cruelest from of tyranny. Obviously it is worse than socialism and is unconstitutional, against the American people, and advocating it or its practice should be seen as punishable offenses against the America people.

Therefore, every patriotic American should oppose socialism and communism and all their components, derivatives, and advocates. One of the foremost methods of furthering socialism and communism is by breaking down the decency, individual liberty, individual independence, education, social, and political systems in America. The chief tool has been propaganda to demean all the good in America and to elevate the base, intolerable, indecent, and profane among us. The most effective method for initiating this process has been political correctness and its derivatives, dominating the media and shifting its orientation and loyalty to the government, and debasing religion and all it means to America.

Redistribution of wealth is a primary tool in establishing a socialist or communist tyranny. It is outrageous that our president and the majority of his appointees in our government have it as a goal and use it as a tool. Redistribution of wealth means to forcibly take wealth (money, property, etc.) from one class of people (those who worked to earn it) and give it to another class of people who did nothing to earn it. If individuals did it, it would be called armed robbery, aggravated robbery, forcible entry and theft or some other felony crime. It is also criminal for the government to propose or practice it. And anyone in, or out of the government, should be charged with these crimes and impeached/prosecuted as appropriate. As mentioned in the previous post progressive income tax in a means of wealth redistribution and should be eliminated.

What to Do?

Rep. Joe Wilson and Supreme Courte Justice Alito took correct and courageous steps to fight the big lies threatening our language and freedom. We can follow their examples. It is our freedom at risk.

All of you can think of words common in our language that should not be overlooked. Don't use them, except in attempts to correct their usage and eliminate those that are intended to reduce or eliminate freedom. Fight to keep our language clear and free of the loaded words of tyranny.

Demagogues, Taxes, Lies, and Unintended Consequences

This post will demolish the leftists' ideas of progressive and regressive taxes. It will also demolish the idea that government spending can stimulate the economy. The large majority of you reading this already know as much or more about these topics as I do. But don't stop reading! Refresh your memory and garner some facts and arguments to use against that annoying neighbor or worthless brother-in-law who voted for Obama and the Democrats.

Point 1. There is no such thing as progressive taxes based on taxing corporations and the rich more. But, when corporations and the rich are taxed at a higher rate than those who make less money, this is called progressive taxing. Often you hear, "make corporations and the rich pay their fair share!" from the ignorant and the left. Oops, that's redundant. From now on I will just say left, or leftists, or Democrats, or socialist since they all mean the same thing. By definition, taxes which are a higher portion of income of the poor are called regressive.

Example. Higher taxes on corporations are regressive not progressive. Suppose lower middle class family A makes about $50,000 per year and pays no direct income taxes and upper middle class family B makes about $200,000 per year and pays about 50% income taxes. Now let's raise taxes on all corporations by 20%. Suppose, too, that almost all of Family A's income goes for "necessities" made by corporations and for Family B about half of their income ($100,000) goes for their "necessities" and the other half for taxes.

If the government raises corporate taxes by 20%, and the corporations pass along the taxes in the form of increased prices (which they must to stay in business and keep employing workers), then let's examine the consequences. Family A must cut back by 20% or $10,000 per year because they need all the necessities they were buying before the tax hike on corporations. This is equivalent to 20% new taxes for Family A and a cut in disposable income from$50,000 per year to $40,000 per year. Obviously the "poor" just got poorer by 20%.

Now, Family B must cut back some of their $100,00 per year necessities. But if you are upper middle class you have a bit of flexibility in your necessities and may only have to cut back $15,000 (less to savings, less to college expenses for educating their children, less to charity, etc.) . Now, based on necessities of $100,000 reduced to $85,000 the "rich" got poorer by 15% of necessities or 7.5% of total income. Even if Family B cut back the full $20,000, it would be 20% of their "necessities" or 10% of their total income.

Who suffered the most from upping corporate taxes? Family A, the "poor" family. Thus, a tax on corporations is a regressive tax because the poor suffer relatively more than the "rich". No tax at all on corporations would help the "poor" more than any other corporate tax scheme; it would lower the rate of increases in prices of necessities--a hidden regressive tax ignored by the socialists.

The final blows to the "poor" from raising corporate taxes come in two ways. First, raising corporate taxes eventually leads to layoff of workers. All other things equal, more "poor" workers get laid off than "rich" workers. Second, when American products become more expensive due to higher taxes, then in a free global market (which we have), cheaper foreign products will pour in and drive more and more American corporations out of business. Then the vicious cycle of higher prices and fewer jobs spirals down the economic health of the entire nation, especially the "poor". Again, higher corporate taxes hurt the "poor" most--they are regressive.

Point 2. Taxing the "rich" is regressive in the short term, in the mid- to long term, it is highly regressive. During the last 50 years it has been demonstrated over and over that government revenues FALL when taxes are raised and RISE when taxes are lowered. Presidents Kennedy, Reagan, and G.W. Bush lowered taxes and government revenues increased and the economy grew. Other Democrat and RINO presidents raised taxes and government revenues fell and the economy shrunk.

Why does this happen? For a variety of reasons. First, every $ spent in the private sector generates about $3 of economic activity by what is called the multiplier effect. For example, every dollar spent in establishing a new business generates about $3 in the economy because that business must hire people and buy new products and services. This new hiring and new buying generates more money in the economy (even more hiring and buying) and thus more taxes for federal revenue.

Second, the more money the "rich" are allowed to keep the more they spend on everything from luxury items (growing more jobs) to investments in new businesses (meaning innovation and,again, many more jobs). Think of how miserable our economy would be today if there were not any "rich" people or companies to invest in development of the transistor, computers, new energy resources, and on and on.

On the other hand, for every dollar taken out of the private sector by taxes, there is a loss of that dollar plus the 3 others it would have generated in the private sector, or an initial loss of $4. Now the government has a huge, nonproductive overhead and tens of millions of dependents so before that dollar is returned to the private sector it may have shrunk to $0.50 or less. With the same multiplier of 3 the benefit to the economy from a tax dollar may be $0.50 + $1.50 = $2 or less. So let's look at the balance: a $ spent in the private sector generates $3 more for a total of $4 in the private economy; a dollar in taxes removes $4 and may return $2 or less to the economy. In other words, a $ left in the private sector generates 3 more for a total of $4. A $ removed by taxes only returns about $2 to the economy--a net loss of $2. Obviously taxing the "rich" and replacing their $4 contribution to the private sector with a $2 government contribution is a bad deal all the way around. Losing a net of $2 from the economy again hurts the "poor" through fewer jobs and higher prices and fewer taxes paid to the government.

Some would argue that increasing government taxing and spending has a positive effect on the economy. But, tax raises and tax cuts over the last 50 years has shown that is not true. Tax cuts grow the economy and jobs. Tax increases and more government spending shrink the economy and jobs.

Therefore, increasing taxes on corporations and/or the rich doesn't help the "poor", it hurts them, and is thus regressive. Only demagogues and their sycophants talk seriously of raising taxes on corporations and the "rich". Everyone else knows that higher taxes and bigger government hurt everyone but the crooked politicians and a few of their collaborators.

So, What's the Solution?

The disingenuous and crooked claim that raising taxes on corporations and the "rich" is progressive, and thus fair. It is regressive taxation and thus very unfair. It is also possible to show that property taxes, and all other taxes not tied to consumption are regressive.

The only progressive tax would be one on consumption, such as a national sales tax on everything applied to everyone. This would be progressive, because the more you earned and spent the more you would be taxed.

The solution is to abolish all taxes except universal and uniform rate national sales taxes. Everyone would pay the same rate, everyone would have "ownership" and thus a stake in preserving our nation, and those who spent more money would pay more taxes.

This will never happen because it would remove the power to tax and to reward rich, crooked politicians and their rich collaborators with regressive taxes.

But abolishing all taxes but a universal, one rate national sales tax is a goal. Each step closer to this goal will result in increased measures of freedom, prosperity, and fairness in our individual lives and in our government. Improving the lives of all Americans is a worthy goal.

Obama Uses Teleprompter for Canned Answers to Students' Questions

This taken from here via the Drudge Report.
How lazy, incompetent, and insecure must Obama be to use prepared answers on Teleprompters when talking with elementary school children and his media entourage. His incompetence and arrogance is amazing. I wonder what the kids thought. Here is the picture from the above link.


This proves what I have long thought. That Obama is controlled by handlers and aids (overseers?) to make sure he spouts the socialist party line and never expresses his incoherent and fuzzy thinking. Wow, a clear illustration of the Peter Principle.

Let's rescue the nation and send this incompetent back to Chicago's crooked politics where he belongs.

Hitler Finds out About Republican Winning in Massachusetts

I stole this video from Brooke.
It is so good I just had to swipe it.

Listen for the comment about Obama's school record. Be prepared, don't be drinking or eating anything, heh heh.

Ronald Reagan Warning on the Dangers of Socialized Medicine and its Effects

**** Big News From Mass.****
**** Hey Obama! Leave Them Trucks Alone!****
**** We Don't Need No Socialism!****

The leftist Democrats call it “the Public Option” or health care for everyone. But it is socialized medicine no matter what you call it. And, it is the first step on a long, downhill path to socialist tyranny.

Please notice the last few seconds of this video and see how much it resembles the situation in North Korea and our situation of teachers indoctrinating our children by singing Obama songs in our schools.

We must stop ObamaCare, as it is pure socialism.

Rescue America: Support Conservative Republicans

It is Time to Take Action

We need to rescue America and bring conservative, constitutional, and patriotic leadership back to Congress in 2010 and regain the White House in 2012. Government of the people, by the people, and for the people must be restored.

We all know the leftist Democrats and the socialist trio of Obama, Reid, and Pelosi are leading us down the path to socialism and tyranny. But now, we have a chance to elect many new conservative Republicans to the U.S. House and Senate. We need this as a step in stopping the irresponsibility and destruction. First, let’s start with the U.S. House of Representatives and take it back vote by vote, district by district, and state by state.

Congressional District 8 (CD-8) in Arizona

Democrat Representative Gabrielle Giffords has voted for the irresponsible and crooked stimulus plan and socialized medicine generally known as Obamacare. She has cast her votes with Nancy Pelosi time after time. She is soft on border issues and constitutional government. The people in Arizona’s CD-8 do not follow the philosophy, the culture, or the politics of San Francisco and Chicago. Instead, citizens in CD-8 have a long tradition of freedom and patriotism from pioneer days to the present. Their wishes and interests are not being represented in Washington. When this situation of government by the elite and distant deal-makers violates the principle of government of the people, by the people, and for the people, it is time to change CD-8’s Representative to the U.S. House of Representatives.

Take heart and know we can have a better federal government and a better House of Representatives.

A New Opportunity

Brian Miller is running for the position of Representative to the U.S. House of Representatives from CD-8 in the state of Arizona. I have spent hours discussing the issues facing America, Arizona, and CD-8 with Brian Miller and I have been repeatedly impressed by his willingness to listen to citizens, his grasp of the issues, his plans and goals for service in the US Congress, and his past service to our nation. Brian Miller would bring a new level of honesty, understanding, service, competence, strong moral and family values, and patriotism to the office of Representative to the US Congress.

Please take the time to read Mr. Miller’s web site and his Freshmen 50 web site. Mr. Miller is accessible and ready to talk to citizens, so take the opportunity to contact him by E-mail or telephone as shown by the “Contact” part of his web site. For your convenience, his web site and contact information are given below.
Brian Miller: Web Site
And: Freshmen-50
E-mail: brian@brianmillerforcongress.com
Telephone: 520-331-4610

The Next Step

If you agree that we need to replace a leftist, liberal Representative in Congress with a conservative Republican, then please make a donation and contact Mr. Miller to find out other ways you can help him rescue our republic from the road to socialism.

Thank you.

Obama to Release Big Lies to Promote Amnesty

Here is a heads up

Obama and his dirty sidekicks, Pelosi, Reid, and Napolitano are planning to release a flurry of big lies about how our illegal immigration problems can all be solved by granting the 30 million or so illegal aliens here amnesty. To support their arguments the MSM will flood the news with happy face and tear jerker studies and articles about illegal aliens and our border war. Of course they won’t use those words, they will be “undocumented entrants” and “those living in the shadows” as well as dozens of other Orwellian Newspeak terms for an illegal invasion and occupation of our country.

To help you get ready for the onslaught, here are a few facts and figures about the criminal invaders and the horrible crimes they commit in America. We deport them and then they come back and do it again, again, and again throughout their lives. Mexico is a failed state and the crime and chaos there are moving north at a faster and faster rate.

In the United States

The Tucson Sector (Border Patrol administrative district covering some 8% of the 4000 mile border with Mexico) accounts for approximately half of the drug and people smuggling into the United States, according to recent data.

A recent Border Patrol news release dealing with 2008 operations has some interesting results.

Tucson Sector agents continue to lead the nation in marijuana seizures accounting for more than 50 percent of all the marijuana seized nationwide. Tucson Sector agents seized a staggering 816,402 pounds of marijuana worth an estimated $649 million, an 8 percent decrease compared with FY 2007. Agents also seized 265 pounds of cocaine, 61 ounces of heroin and 23 pounds of methamphetamine. Border Patrol checkpoints had a significant impact on the narcotic smuggling infrastructure. Seizures at the checkpoints increased by 63 percent with 29,813 pounds of marijuana seized. This is a dramatic increase from the FY 2007 total of 18,979 pounds. The majority of the seizures occurred at the Interstate 19 checkpoint with over 18,000 pounds, proving yet again that checkpoints are a vital piece in the multi-layered defense-in-depth national strategy that is used by the Border Patrol. source

In addition to this, the Tucson Sector agents also arrested almost 318,000 illegal aliens. An estimated 1 out of 3 to 1 out of 9 illegal invaders are caught; the remainder make it into the US undetected. So under the most optimistic estimate, some 1 million illegal aliens entered Arizona in 2009. You can also multiply the drugs mentioned above by about 3 to get an estimate of how much the drug and people smugglers brought into the Unites States in 2008 through the Tucson Sector.

Now let’s look at the kind of people who are illegally invading America. From the data given in the Border Patrol, you know that about 3 pounds of marijuana are smuggled in for each illegal alien. What you probably didn’t know is that many of the illegal aliens are taken back to Mexico and released. (Others are released within the US but that is for a different posting). Many of those arrested, are convicted of felonies and sent to Mexico soon return to the United States. In another Border Patrol news release in 2009, it is stated that about 20% of the illegal aliens have been convicted of crimes, most notably rape, child molestation, and murder.

Roughly 20 percent of illegal immigrants caught by the Border Patrol during the 2009 fiscal year had convictions for crimes such as rape, child molestation or murder, according to a news release. source

These 2009 statistics of 20% arrested with criminal convictions means that about 20% of 1 million illegal immigrants entering the US in 2009 (that is about 200,000) probably were convicted criminals. This is supported strongly by previous data showing the majority of felonies in Arizona are committed by illegal aliens crossing the Mexican Border.

Summary of 2005-2007 illegal alien crime in Arizona at the federal level:

Felony convictions in US federal courts in Arizona, FY 2005-2007
Total: 13,425 (100%)
Illegal Aliens: 9,804 (73%)
All Other: 3,621 (27%)
source

Along the Border States

Norte (Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua) , El Universal (Mexico City) 1/7/10
Juarez & Tijuana starting a new year
Eight more men were assassinated in Juarez yesterday; there have already been 51 homicide victims there during the first six days of the year. The number of homicide victims in Tijuana has reached 25 since the end of the year; the latest one is an unknown man found dumped on a street, minus his head. source

Barbarism Widespread in Mexico

El Debate (Culiacan Sinaloa) 1/7/10
Not a ball for a game
Around 2 a.m. on Thursday, police in Los Mochis, Sinaloa, received a report that some men had left something inside a black plastic bag out on the street. What the police first thought to be a human head turned out to be a soccer ball with the actual face of a man sewn onto it. Another call to the police led to the finding of ice chests inside of which were the rest of the man’s head as well as his thorax and other body parts along with a “narco-message.” source

Beheadings and other barbarisms are coming our way: Fight amnesty

As you can see from some of these newspaper accounts in Mexican papers, the violence and crime in Mexico are incredible. Defeat Obama’s amnesty or millions of these crimes will move to America.
And, the illegal invaders will block-vote Democrat. Hello one party rule in America.

TSA More Trouble than Help in Stopping Terrrorists

(Janet and A Full Body Scan. Pictures from drudgereport.com)

We All Knew What Would Happen to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

When President Bush compromised with the Democrats and let them require that TSA employees be government employees, we all knew it would become a bloated, self-serving, ineffective, and dysfunctional agency.

It was proven when we started to fly again after 9/11. We saw idiotic procedures, lazy, shuffling, TSA Agents wondering around doing nothing. And when we spoke to them, most were either surly and disrespectful or dumb as a post like one of Red Skelton’s characters. Flyers insulted, abused, embarrassed, and made to wait while TSA agents gossipped and ate and ate. The incompetent, unqualified, and untrained TSA Agents became as nasty as the worst of the Motor Vehicle Department employees. Public service and courtesy were not part of their training.

No young, bearded men from the Middle East were pulled out of line searched, patted down, and made to undress, nope. But they gave grandmas and harried working men a hard time, delays, and useless searches. TSA spent so much time being politically correct and inspecting Americans that they knew weren’t terrorists and wouldn’t complain, that they continually missed shoe bombers, panty bombers, and who knows how many sleeper jihad agents hiding in America right now. It is politically correct to detain, pat down, and search a 70 year old grandma from Peoria. It is not politically correct to detain and search surly, young, bearded men from the Middle East. Oh no, that would be profiling. Better to let untold thousands of Americans die unimaginable cruel and horrible deaths than to offend an Islamic jihadist or his silent supporters who routinely contribute money and cover to the cause of killing Americans.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now wants to use scanners on Americans. Look at the picture above and imagine what the TSA agents will be seeing in a year or so when better and better technology comes along. I say TSA should use these scanners on foreigners seeking to enter the US and traveling within the US. They should not be used on ordinary American citizens without probable cause.

A Modest Proposal- TSA Puts America First

All TSA agents take rigid physical and mental qualifications tests and the unfit removed from government employment. Those that passed the test should undergo boot camp-like training at Quantico to get them if physical shape and train them how to take down a suspect. The existing FBI Profiling Unit at Quantico should be expanded to include terrorist profiling and all TSA agents should have periodic terrorist identification refresher courses. All TSA agents would then profile all flyers for potential terrorists.

How about TSA cooperates with foreign governments to do our own screening on the asphalt after the regular airport screening but just before boarding Flights to the US? Here we could form two lines, one for US citizens who would undergo routine screenings and one for foreigners who would undergo extensive search, including all luggage and full body scans. Fingerprints and high resolution photographs, and DNS samples would be collected from all foreigners. Anyone, foreign or American on a no fly list would be escorted back to the local authorities.

A similar setup of two lines could be set up in the US; one for citizens with normal screening and one for foreigners with more intensive searches and full body scans. Again, fingerprints and high resolution photographs, and DNS samples would be collected from all foreigners.

A large and well trained K-9 division of TSA should screen all passengers with special, intensive screening of foreigners seeking to fly to the US and traveling within the US. All travelers profiled as likely terrorists should receive intensive inspection by the K-9 agents before and after whole body screening and regular physical searches. All luggage should be screened by K-9 agents as well.

But, sadly authority for the TSA runs downhill from Obama & Congress, and DHS head Janet Neapolitan. As long as the joker is running things, sensible protection of Americans will not happen.

Janet Neapolitan Must Go

Janet Napolitano is head of the Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) which is a dysfunctional agency doing far, far more harm to America than good.

I hear and read Janet called a variety of names, all appropriate. Here are some of them:
Janet Clownitano; Janet Incompetento; Janet Nitwititano; Big Sis; and my favorite, Janet Neapolitan.

That kind of ice cream comes in 1 and 2 gallon tubs from discount stores. Just imagine how fast she could tear through a 2 gallon tub of Neapolitan ice cream while writing press releases saying “there is no indication that this incident was terrorism or that anyone but the individual arrested was involved.” This happens every time there is a conspiracy producing an Islamic jihad attack on America.

Even scarier than her constant apologies and cover-ups for terrorists is the fact that she is in charge of US border security. That means that a million or 2 illegal aliens, drug smugglers, felons, repeat invaders, and an unknown number of Islamic jihadists cross the border every year.

To steal a turn of phrase from Churchill, she can best be described as follows. “Never in history has one person done so much to destroy the security of so many.”

The Dept. of Homeland Security should be abolished and its pro-US functions transferred to other, more capable Departments and agencies. Its anti-American functions should be retired along with Janet Neapolitan.

The Next Crisis from Obama in the Destruction of America is via Amnesty for 30 Million Criminal Invaders

Warning: 2010 is the Year of Amnesty

As the leftists return from their secular holidays (I bet they wanted lots of presents though!), they will take up Phase 4 in the destruction of America. Phase 1 was the huge budget deficits and targeted money to the worst among us. Phase 2 was socialized medicine, Phase 3 is Cap and Trade global warming alarmism and taxing, but it has been put on the back burner because of the extreme cold. Phase 4 is amnesty for 30 million illegal aliens and the instant creation of 30 million new welfare dependents and perhaps 10-20 million new block-voters for the Democrats.

We may survive Phases 1-3 of the takeover plan, but we cannot survive Phase 4 if it is successful. Why? The resulting 10-20 million new block-votes are enough to cement Democrat rule forever. This is the must win battle for America’s future. It is more important than the combined harm of Phases 1-3 combined. It is the biggest challenge this nation has ever faced; greater than all our wars combined. If we lose the battle over amnesty for illegal aliens we lose America forever.

Some Irresponsible Daydreams

First, is that this issue is not near as important as increased taxes, the Islamic war on America, or socialized medicine. We can recover from these things; they are reversible with conservative majorities in Congress and a conservative White House and Supreme Court. Difficult? Yes. Possible? Yes. If patriotic Americans come together and act we can win these battles against the leftist forces of socialism and tyranny.

Second, Illegal immigration is a regional issue and not a national crisis or a threat to our nation. This kind of thinking arose from years of propaganda by the open border crowd and those wanting cheap labor and block-voters. Imagine this scenario. Both houses of Congress controlled by 70-80% majorities of leftist radicals, Obama in the White House for the foreseeable future, and a Supreme Court packed with 7 or 8 leftists. If this happens, America will have permanent one party rule and tyranny forever. Ten to twenty million new Democrat voters could make this happen.

Third, that an armed citizenry will have the power to stop tyranny. The US military is the most powerful in history. Recent events in Afghanistan (top commanders bending to Obama’s will; we need civilian control, but they could have resigned) and Ft. Hood (a politically correct general joining in the cover-up) demonstrate that the military forces may be succumbing to the disease of political correctness. No rag-tag group of patriots could stand up to the might of the US military obeying Obama’s orders. And remember, as commander in chief he can order the military to stand down and let his personal Brown Shirts (union thugs, Acorn thugs, and the civilian forces he proposed in the campaign) crush the patriots.

How Do Patriots Fight Tyranny?

We need a constitutionally guaranteed protest of united patriots up to ten times larger than the Tea Party patriots. We need to put 10-20 million peaceful protesters in Washington, DC and then millions in other major cities. And, we need to use our combined politically power to defeat amnesty, illegal immigration, and open borders as the first step in rescuing out Republic.