Saturday, August 07, 2010

Like Other Leftist Projects, the Volt is a Scam, at the Taxpayers' Expense

Like other loony leftist ideas the Government Motors Volt is illogical, indefensible, much more harmful to the environment than helpful, and all done with taxpayers money for a very few of the leftist elite.

Here is some of what Jonah Goldberg had to say.

Because the Volt’s sticker price might be too high for even that crowd, the government is offering a federal subsidy of up to $7,500 (Californians have a state subsidy, too), which means that working-class people will be helping to pay for playthings for upper-income people.

“Like the EV1 that GM tried to peddle in the California market,” Kenneth Green, an environmental scientist at the American Enterprise Institute, says, “the Volt is a vanity car for the well-off that will be subsidized by less well-off taxpayers at all stages, from R&D to sales and to the construction of charging stations.”

Indeed, the Volt’s price is $41,000, but the cost is much higher. “Government Motors” is already selling the car at a loss. According to the blogger Doctor Zero, if you apply the subsidies that have gone directly into the car to just the first 10,000 vehicles, the cost is more like $81,000 per car.

Of course, electric-car boosters say this sort of thing is necessary to get the industry up and running. (Green responds: “Supporters claim that electric cars need subsidies because they’re still in their infancy. Electric cars have been around for over 100 years. That’s some infancy.”)

But would it be a good thing if we all switched to electric cars? The point is to reduce CO2 emissions, right? But in some regions, we get our electricity from CO2-spewing coal. The more electricity pulled from the grid, the more coal is burned, essentially replacing dirty oil with dirtier coal (which is why some coal backers see much promise in electric cars). Studies confirm that China — which is allegedly “beating us” in the race to a green economy — would produce vastly more greenhouse emissions if it switched to electric vehicles. source.


There you have it. Another "green swindle" at the taxpayers' expense.

3 Comments:

At 2:15 PM, Anonymous Baxter Dogg said...

Other than in the urban areas on the Blue Coasts, the Volt is also incredibly impractical as well. In my case a Volt would only get me halfway to a grocery store on the battery. Then I would have to make the rest of the trip to the store and all the way back using its incredibly inefficient gasoline engine. If you drive a car less than 40 miles a day even a Yugo would be a better choice. And you can pick one of those up for a lot less than $41.0000.

 
At 8:48 PM, Blogger LomaAlta said...

Exactly right Baxter. According to the reports, with a full charge, on level grounds, and at 20 mph it will go 40 miles. Go faster than 20, go uphill, or any normal driving activities and the Volt wont even go 40 miles. Yes, even a 30 year old Yugo would be a better buy for $41K.

But leftists have to have their "green badge", and of course, always at the taxpayers' expense.

 
At 10:09 AM, Blogger Brooke said...

I loved Rush's commentary on this farce!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home